Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court upholds dismissal of Barack Obama immigration action lawsuit
Politico ^ | April 7, 2015 | Josh Gerstein

Posted on 04/07/2015 11:50:42 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Mr. K
WHO IN THE HELL HAS ‘STANDING’ TO DO ANYTHING TO THIS COMMIE MUSLIM PIECE OF CRAP INN THE WHITE HOUSE?

The militia does. Unfortunately, there are no true patriots alive today. To act would require far too much sacrifice. The Founders would b!tch slap us if they were here today. AFTER they had removed the traitors from DC.

21 posted on 04/07/2015 12:23:08 PM PDT by dware (The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Last I heard the response was filed within 48 hours, filed on that Saturday.


22 posted on 04/07/2015 12:24:13 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
It's definitely the 21st century tyrant's phrase of choice.

alleged a sufficiently concrete and particularized injury

Anyone who can't see the injuries inflicted daily on a large scale is deaf dumb and blind.

23 posted on 04/07/2015 12:24:23 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

In Obama’s legal world, nobody has standing to challenge him in court.


24 posted on 04/07/2015 12:24:46 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“Mississippi submitted no evidence that any DACA eligible immigrants resided in the state. Nor did Mississippi produce evidence of costs it would incur if some DACA-approved immigrants came to the state.”

The state messed up bad. Sounds like the court would have heard them if the state had given them a chance.
Heck, school costs are obvious.

25 posted on 04/07/2015 12:34:31 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Like those in Congress, too many Federal Judges across this country are scared of the obozo administration for themselves and their families and will not risk going against it. Even admitting it as such could result in consequences. Maybe I’m wrong but I don’t believe all of whom I speak are as evil and anti American as obozo and his minions so what else could it be?? It’s how organized crimes works and organized crime has obviously taken our WH.


26 posted on 04/07/2015 12:36:21 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/conncarroll/2015/03/20/federal-judge-n1973696

At a one-hour hearing in Brownsville, Hanen gave the Justice Department 48 hours to file a motion in response. He said he would then rule promptly on whether to require the government to produce documents concerning applications under Obama’s deferred action program.

I cannot find how he ruled.


27 posted on 04/07/2015 12:38:07 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If this is the “logic” from our black-robed oppressors then how in the hell do all of the watermelon-Marxist greenie groups have standing to sue the Federal government?

If patriots ever get control of all 3 branches of government we need to pass laws that severely curtail the power of the federal courts and pass a law that explicitly grants the states, local governments, and citizens standing to sue the federal government and agencies for damages and unconstitutional acts. Federal bureaucrats also need their bogus immunity from lawsuits removed as well.


28 posted on 04/07/2015 12:38:08 PM PDT by WMarshal (“A man’s rights rest in three boxes. The ballot box, jury box, and the cartridge" - F. Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

I was thinking that too. Who wrote Mississippi’s challenge - the weak link?


29 posted on 04/07/2015 12:38:24 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

In this case the panel made the right decision.

If you go to court making the argument that something is hurting you financially, you better have solid evidence that you are being hurt financially. A 9 year old study on a matter that is at best tangentally related doesn’t cut it.

I mean, the plaintiffs couldn’t even show that there were DACA’s in their state? Really???


30 posted on 04/07/2015 1:03:22 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

That is what it sounds like to me as well. They brought a pretty feeble case if the reporting is accurate - a big if.


31 posted on 04/07/2015 1:09:00 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: don-o

DOJ did respond. I believe Hanen has not yet ruled.

http://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=14308

There is a detailed list of events at the foot of this document, but it is current only through February

http://www.scribd.com/doc/254804151/USDC-TXSD-14-254-Texas-Et-Al-v-US-PACER-Docket-as-of-2-04-2015#scribd


32 posted on 04/07/2015 1:09:58 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Thanks. I want to read those. Hanen was not a happy camper on March 19 and I am very interested in the current status of that case.


33 posted on 04/07/2015 1:15:49 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Events through March 22 at the foot of this document

http://www.scribd.com/doc/259553771/PACER-DOCKET-USDC-TXSD-B-14-Cv-254-State-of-Texas-Et-Al-v-USA-Et-Al-as-of-March-22-2015#scribd


34 posted on 04/07/2015 1:21:46 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
"So you have to get your head blown off before you can sue because your head was blown off. Got it."

That might give you standing. But to win you have to prove that your cranium removal was a known result, or an intended consequence, of that action by a specific party.

35 posted on 04/07/2015 1:31:05 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Every single citizen has standing, whether these dumb ass judges grasp that or not.

If I held power and there was any way to do it, I’d remove these judges.


36 posted on 04/07/2015 1:33:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
"The state messed up bad."

Yep. They know better too. Proof of fiscal impact is mandatory.

37 posted on 04/07/2015 1:35:59 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Here’s the Saturday March 21 DOJ response to the March 19 order

http://www.scribd.com/doc/259518538/USDC-TXSD-14-254-DOC-207-Defendant-Response-to-Opposed-Motion-for-Early-Discovery#scribd


38 posted on 04/07/2015 1:41:11 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

BS...what they need is real victims...but then the court would say that other people are vitcims ,of other people, and toss it because they are treated equally under the law.

This maddness......time for Sparta.


39 posted on 04/07/2015 1:46:59 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
because evidence that the agents or the state would be harmed by the effort was too speculative.

And the Kelo decision to seize private property and give it to others who could profit more was NOT speculative?

You can tell that the courts are now just making crap up to justify the government position, regardless of the issues.

-PJ

40 posted on 04/07/2015 1:47:01 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson