FReerepublic!!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Continue Giving You Many Satisfying Returns!!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 04/08/2015 7:33:16 PM PDT by VinL
Every self-proclaimed political sophisticate two weeks ago: “Ted Cruz has no chance of winning the Republican primary! Harrumph! Harrumph!”
Same guys today: “He raised how much [expletive deleted] money in less than a week?”
[“I didn’t get a harrumph out of you.”]
Senator Cruz has in fact raised an extraordinary amount of money in only a few days. “There are no known cases in which an operation backing a White House hopeful has collected this much money in less than a week,” reports Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin.
I know it hasn’t been long, but let’s revisit those exercises in existential certitude. Jamelle Bouie, in Slate, under a headline demanding “let’s not even pretend that the Texas senator has a chance,” argued that Cruz is too radical, that “strength in numbers hasn’t overcome the strength of influence possessed by the ‘moderates.’” How so? “Part of this is resources. Even when he stumbled, Mitt Romney had the cash and staff he needed to survive into the next contest.” Ah—cash, you say? Cash is indeed important, and thus so is Cruz’s—what was Bloomberg’s phrase?—“record haul.” Harry Enten at FiveThirtyEight, under the headline “Let’s Be Serious About Ted Cruz From The Start: He’s Too Extreme And Too Disliked To Win,” proclaiming “Influential party actors dislike him.”
In Bloomberg, under a headline proclaiming Cruz a “loudmouthed loser,” Jonathan Bernstein argued that “almost anybody can win a Senate nomination, in the right state and circumstances”—an evidence-free proposition—but insisted that in presidential primaries “flukes simply don’t happen.” (Reagan, Clinton, and Obama be damned.) He later doubled down: “Everything we know about presidential-nomination politics cuts against Cruz as a plausible candidate.” Everything? Why? “Nomination politics isn’t about the candidates much at all. It’s about the party.”
So, the guy who a fortnight ago could not possibly ever in a million billion gazillion years win is raising unprecedented amounts of money. What gives? What a great many self-proclaimed political sophisticates do not get is that politics on the Right is not dominated by the Republican party; it is dominated by the never-ending contest between a Republican party that wants to make the conservative movement its instrument and a conservative movement that wants to make the GOP its instrument. Listen to the talk-radio callers, or read the comments at NRO, and you will find that conservatives believe—wrongly, I think, but deeply—that the Republican muckety-mucks have shoved candidates down their throats, and that the GOP powers-that-be would rather lose with John McCain and Mitt Romney (and Jeb Bush) than win with Cruz. (Again, I think this line of thinking is erroneous: Romney became the nominee not because Republican power-brokers conspired on his behalf, but because the guy I liked couldn’t beat him.)
That feeling is not limited to the people who call into radio shows. There are leaders of large and influential conservative organizations who feel that way, and there are conservatives sitting on enormous piles of money who feel that way, too. And they are determined that neither the self-proclaimed political sophisticates nor the party operatives are going to choose their nominee this time around. The people at Slate and Bloomberg and such believe that Cruz cannot win because once the activist conservative discontents are smothered by the party establishment, it’s the establishment’s show. But that’s begging the question. The 2016 Republican primary is in no small part an internecine knife fight about who is to have the upper hand in rightworld. We have a tea-party movement, and a raucous and rivalrous gang of independent groups, precisely because GOP leaders cannot exercise the sort of control over their coalition that Democrats do over theirs. Left-leaning PACs and independent groups are a supplement to the Democrats’ machine; right-leaning groups are an alternative to the Republicans’ machine.
People who don’t understand that the name “Karl Rove” gets hissed every bit intensely as the name “Barack Obama” simply do not understand what is happening on the Right.
LOL, i just realized that that thing next to my name (however it got there) looks like a female boob. haha
I gots to go figure out how to remove it.
I would love to politically destroy the liberal GOP-E. I work hard to do that.
Cornyn and Strauss need to lose their office. I aim to help make that happen. Cornyn has proven to me that he won't listen to the base. His cloture vote to allow unlimited raising of the debt by the executive got him a lot of phone calls, and scathing e-mails from many conservatives, including me. Then, apparently, his mailbox and message center did the 'spin, crash, burn, die' thing. Same thing for supporting Cruz filibuster.
I don't want to 'work with him' I want him to lose his office. I don't need a liberal in there.
/johnny
He'd listen to a base that forces him to listen.
You can't make someone listen if they won't listen.
Nope, Cornyn gets fired just like Dewhurst got fired. I don't want to bring him over, I want him gone. So do a lot of other folks.
And we've got a long time to arrange that.
/johnny
I’m waiting for the articles saying Cruz is just like every other politician. Getting bought off by the big lobbys, big oil, Koch Brothers, etc.
Your $100 and the hundreds of thousands like you and me won’t get mentioned.
Did anybody really say that?
Did anybody really deny that he could win at least one primary -- probably more?
Winning against the Democrat, though, that could be tough for Ted.
If all it takes to thwart your effort is unplugging a phone, then you’re not doing it right. Don’t ask him to listen...force him to listen. Apply real political pressure.
Do you think the left would have taken over the Democrat party if they were stopped by unplugged phones?
As far as I'm concerned, he needs to be fired. I don't care if the liberal Republicans get fired or not. I'm not a republican, even if I take advantage of their love for open primaries.
I'm very glad that Dewhurst is gone. That's one GOP-E favorite that needed gone. One of the guys that endorsed Dewhurst was Perry, and Perry is gone from Texas politics now, too.
/johnny
Right, you’re not a Republican, yet the existence of the Republican party is a necessary condition for the election of your preferred presidential candidate. I guess that’s principled of you, or something.
As for keeping RINOs in line, it’s all of our responsibility to control politicians who don’t represent our viewpoint. If thousands of people knocking on doors doesn’t work, then let’s find something that does work.
I’m just saying let’s not roll over and accept the premise that we can’t do something about our situation. Rather than accept defeat and resort to passive defeatist tactics like staying home or voting for leftists, let’s man up and be salient and impose our will on the situation.
I never accept the premise of those that would try to get conservatives to vote for a leftist republican candidate.
No rolling over here. We just didn't start early enough with Cornyn. We got an early start this time.
I know getting rid of Dewhurst didn't happen overnight either. He's another one that chose to ignore the base, but the GOP-E loved him. He's fired here now.
Strauss and Cornyn are next.
Beloved by the GOP-E and not listen to the base means firing them.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.