[SeekAndFind]

RE: Gov’t Will Force Pastors to Obey Law or Face Prison

I can see that happening Alinsky style.

Saul Alinsky did not propose change in one big bang. He proposed to do it slowly but surely and do it subtly, one institution at a time, starting with the weaker one.

So, I can see Military Chaplains (who are employees of the federal government ) being coerced first.

Then, after this is done, they can say, hey if it’s OK for the military chaplains, why can’t it be OK for churches (unless of course you want to have your tax exempt status revoked )...

etc. etc. etc.

Some people will laugh at this. But there used to be a time when killing a near born baby ( the one near full term ) was unthinkable.

Now, even Obama does not think it should be illegal to ban aborting the near born baby,

When Obama says he is “evolving” don’t believe it. His definition of “evolution” is exactly in Alinsky’s playbook.

[21twelve]

I have a lawyer friend that is very much against gay marriage. And as hard as it is to see some churches allow gay marriage, he has said the same thing.

“Whether our church decides or not, the day is soon coming when all churches will need to perform gay weddings by law.”

[ansel12]

Some people will laugh at this. But there used to be a time when killing a near born baby ( the one near full term ) was unthinkable.

By their second party platform, 1974, right after Wade v Roe, libertarians were already pushing for full term abortion, in 1972 they had written in a 100 day period, which they dropped in the 1974 platform.

[markomalley]

(snip) Saul Alinsky did not propose change in one big bang. He proposed to do it slowly but surely and do it subtly, one institution at a time, starting with the weaker one. (snip)

What I see happening is some innocuous language being sneaked into a congressional bill. Something along the lines of "hate groups shall not be provided any appropriated funds and shall not be afforded tax exempt status." (leaving the meaning of "hate group" as an open question)

Naturally, no Congressweenie in his right mind would oppose such a thing (after all, would they defend supporting giving tax exempt status to the KKK or the like?)

After that verbiage passes in the law, the Executive defines a Hate Group as one designated by the SPLC or the HRC (along with a couple of others, such as Amnesty, and so on).

(I can see a considerable amount more but, thankfully, Ø only has 1-1/2 years left...the continuation of that depends upon who is selected to be the public face for his third term in office...)