Every Republican candidate - EVERY ONE - need to implement a policy of videotaping every interview with their own equipment. No exceptions. As long as the democrat press maintains control of the electronic property, they will control the narrative.
Absolutely correct! I don’t understand why it isn’t being done more already.
BTW, there are many “subtle” ways for interviewers to lie. For instance, TV interviews are often shot with one camera (especially when “on location”). The camera is pointed at the subject of the interview. Then, after the interview is complete, the camera is turned on to the interviewer for a series of “reaction shots”. These reaction shots are supposed to match the body language of the interviewer, while the interview took place. That would be the honest way to do things. However, it’s easy to substitute (say) an expression of shock, or derision for the expressions of “rapt attention” or “concern and empathy” that the interviewer was feigning during the interview. (Or vice versa). That would be an example of lying via the reaction shots. Point a (second) camera at the interviewer throughout. If the reaction shots don’t match the interviewer’s actual body language during the interview; you could publish a split-screen comparison on YouTube, and let everyone in on the interviewers sneakiness. That might keep them honest.