Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obamas Pay $93,362 in Federal Taxes for 2014 Income; Gave $70k to charities
Christian Post ^ | 04/11/2015 | Anugrah Kumar

Posted on 04/11/2015 10:58:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

President Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, paid $93,362 in federal taxes last year with an earning of $477,383, which is a lower income than in the past few years due to a decline in the sales of the president's biographies. They gave $70,712 to 33 charities.

The Obamas paid taxes at an effective rate of 19.6 percent, according to 2014 tax returns released by the White House, The Associated Press reports.

"In January 2013, the President signed into law legislation that extended tax cuts to middle-class and working families and helped improve the country's fiscal health by asking the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest wrote on the White House blog. "In 2014, as a result of his policies, the President was subject to limitations in tax preferences for high-income earners, as well as additional Medicare and investment income taxes."

Obama is paid $400,000 for his position as the president, but he also earned from publishers Dystel and Goderich and Random House, and interest.

The president and his wife gave $70,712 to 33 charities, and their largest gift of $22,012 went to Fisher House Foundation, which houses military families while a relative receives treatment, according to Reuters.

Obama received $51,167 from Random House and $43,722 from Dystel & Goderich, according to tax returns.

They claimed nearly $160,000 in itemized deductions.

The Obamas made $94,889 from the sale of Obama's books, down from more than $116,000 the previous year.

(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charity; obama; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: TruthWillWin

They claim that the Pres’s returns are “public”, but I’ve never seen any posted online. I’m guessing the CPAs who prepare those returns are pretty strict about his-her deductions, but after Timmy “TurboTax” Geithner, and all the other commie/marxist/socialist scumbags in that regime-from-hell, who knows?


21 posted on 04/11/2015 12:05:05 PM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're just the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
DO THOSE INCOME FIGURES INCLUDE (1) amounts secreted in numbered offshore bank accounts,(2) investment holdings, (3) safe deposit boxes holding coins, gold, valuables, etc, (4) other holdings in real estate, businesses, (5) rental, interest accrued, investment income, etc .....

DO THE OBAMA'S HAVE "PASSIVE INCOME?"---the IRS considers passive income "unearned income"..... and is not taxable.

"Unearned income" is received without providing personal labor or services....and is easily hidden. Examples of unearned income are dividends, interest, rents, royalties, capital gains, etc.....

One huge source of passive income – is high interest money market or saving accounts like Vanguard ING, HSBC etc. that pay low rates but earn monthly income without having to do anything.....but you don't have access to the money.

TYPES OF PASSIVE INCOME:

1.Dividends – One of the best, most consistent forms of passive income. Dividend-paying stocks are generally about as rock-solid as you can get in the stock market, and pay consistent dividends. This is almost-guaranteed money.

2.Capital Gains – While not passive income in the same sense that dividends are, I still include it here. Whether you’re watching the ticker or not, your stocks are ( potentially ) increasing in value over time.

3.Real Estate Cash Flow – If you own real estate and have tenants, you should have cash flow. This is mostly hands-off – you get that income regardless.

4. Equity Growth--investment real estate grows in value. The longer you hold it, the more equity you gain (barring r/e bubbles, collapses, etc).

=============================================

What was the Obama's IRS form entry for "interest income?

22 posted on 04/11/2015 12:20:42 PM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

I would like to see those “deductions” as well.


23 posted on 04/11/2015 12:27:13 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

That number leapt out at me too. 160k????


24 posted on 04/11/2015 12:29:11 PM PDT by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
with an earning of $477,383

They must clip a lot of coupons to be able to manage over $800 million in vacations each year.

25 posted on 04/11/2015 12:34:21 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
Deductions? Mostly payments to his ghost writer, William Ayres.

Really, what is “income” to people like this? They don't report “international” contributions to their Cayman accounts or Liebrary. They don't report vacations or free golf or taxpayers putting up Mother Robinson, Aunt Zeituni and Uncle Omar as “income.”

The flat tax could have a little problem in determining just what “income” means.

26 posted on 04/11/2015 12:34:44 PM PDT by Zuse (I am disrupted! I am offended! I am insulted! I am outraged!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“They claimed nearly $160,000 in itemized deductions.”

But only gave $70,000 to “charities”? So what were the other $90,000 in deductions? They never pay a dime for anything.


27 posted on 04/11/2015 12:41:21 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riflema; eyedigress

$160,000 in deductions on less than $500,000 income... should have been a massive red flag to the IRS, unless his paperwork never saw the light of day and was walked thru the system quickly and quietly.


28 posted on 04/11/2015 12:41:37 PM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're just the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
...and no telling how much taxpayer monies for vacations.

Came here to say that.

29 posted on 04/11/2015 12:41:45 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the libs say we are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zuse

I’d bet that there are plenty of “discrepancies” in 0bummer’s paperwork, especially in those “contributions” and “deductions” sections.


30 posted on 04/11/2015 1:06:31 PM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're just the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

We always itemize and have NEVER had deductions that were 1/3 of our income. And they don’t pay for a darn thing!!!


31 posted on 04/11/2015 1:38:51 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

The charitable donations would be part of the itemized deductions.


32 posted on 04/11/2015 3:15:19 PM PDT by jocon307 (Tell it like it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

“The charitable donations would be part of the itemized deductions.”

If $70,000 is part of the $160,000 in itemized deductions they claimed, my question is what could the $90,000 making up the rest of the itemizations be? These people apparently don’t pay for anything out of their own pockets. How could they have another $90,000 to claim?


33 posted on 04/11/2015 4:53:32 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Yeah, no, you are right. After I hit “post” I read your comment again and realized you had calculated that in.

It is astonishing that they would have deductions so high. Have they released the entire return, or just a summary?

You know what, I don’t care. The problem with the Obamas isn’t that they don’t pay enough taxes or give enough to charity, their problems go way beyond that actually.


34 posted on 04/11/2015 6:02:58 PM PDT by jocon307 (Tell it like it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Well, his used underwear may be much more than slick willies 9 bucks.


35 posted on 04/12/2015 10:20:03 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Well they had 70k in charitable contribs

I’m sure interest and prop taxes on a couple mansions aren’t cheap

so there’s a good chunk of it


36 posted on 04/12/2015 10:23:53 AM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Libtards will hold auctions at Sotheby’s for rights to those. lol.


37 posted on 04/12/2015 10:30:53 AM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're just the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I laud his contribution to Fisher House, but the rest is suspect, IMO.


38 posted on 04/12/2015 10:31:38 AM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're just the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson