Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
Yes, I think the left could. I’ve met a LOT of folks who would gladly eliminate all religious freedom protections, calling it “tolerance”. I’ve met many who would gladly eliminate the right to bear arms.

YOu miss the point. THE PEOPLE don't get a vote to ratify proposed amendments. The state legislatures do. It's this kind of (intentional?) misunderstanding of the process that robs your complaints of any logical power.

73 posted on 04/13/2015 5:04:24 AM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Doug Loss

“YOu miss the point. THE PEOPLE don’t get a vote to ratify proposed amendments. The state legislatures do. It’s this kind of (intentional?) misunderstanding of the process that robs your complaints of any logical power. “

You mean legislatures like Indiana, that just gave gays special protection in an act that was supposed to protect religious freedom? You mean the legislatures of NY & CA? You think the amended Constitution would have any more protection for religious freedom than the current one? Or the courts would pay any more attention to it?

Suppose they passed and ratified an Amendment reading “We REALLY mean what was said in Amendments 9 and 10!” Do you think any court would give a rat’s rear end?

Do you think the country is more or less supportive of states rights in 2015 than in 1783?

Y’all are nuts! We’ll never get MORE protection than what is written in right now, nor will the courts give anything written and ratified more than lip service for a few years.


74 posted on 04/13/2015 7:34:13 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson