Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael van der Galien

She is egotistical. She could not have conceived them on her own. And she could have ‘family’ in many other ways.


3 posted on 04/12/2015 8:10:17 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think we've reached PEAK TYRANNY now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goodnesswins
She is egotistical. She could not have conceived them on her own. And she could have ‘family’ in many other ways.

Does she remind anyone of whack job woman in America that had a bunch of invitro kids and is living off the taxpayers?

19 posted on 04/12/2015 9:01:39 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins

I fall into your camp. There are many ways she could enjoy ‘family,’ share her love, etc. without having to bring as many as 4 babies into the world that it is unlikely she will live long enough to raise.

She may live another 20-30 years, but that doesn’t mean she will be able to ‘mommy’ them, even as babies.


37 posted on 04/12/2015 12:59:06 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson