Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theophilus
Why is the fact that Scott was "unarmed" relevant?

For a guy who is armed and who is resisting, the fact that he is armed is indeed relevant.

30 posted on 04/14/2015 10:11:16 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
If he happens to have a holstered or concealed firearm and is running away is it OK to shoot him in the back?

On the other hand:

A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead...however...Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. —Justice Byron White, Tennessee v. Garner[3]

36 posted on 04/14/2015 10:44:07 AM PDT by Theophilus (Be as prolific as you are pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson