I think there are two judges who are skeptical of the Administration’s position. Perhaps that’s not clear here, in this article, but it was more clear in another article I read.
I meant the first judge that started this - without him, we would be toast
The sentence takes some parsing: "In a previous case concerning carbon emissions rules, states had standing. I will weigh that fact heavily here in considering whether Texas has standing in this immigration case."
The gist is yes, there are two skeptical judges and one Administration lackey on this panel.