Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA

I think there are two judges who are skeptical of the Administration’s position. Perhaps that’s not clear here, in this article, but it was more clear in another article I read.


9 posted on 04/17/2015 3:25:56 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

I meant the first judge that started this - without him, we would be toast


10 posted on 04/17/2015 3:28:23 PM PDT by 11th_VA (where's Brutus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
Also expressing misgivings was Judge Jerry Smith, who said a U.S. Supreme Court case in which several states were found to have standing in suing federal environmental regulators over lacking carbon emissions rules would weigh heavily in his judgment of whether Texas had standing in the present case.

The sentence takes some parsing: "In a previous case concerning carbon emissions rules, states had standing. I will weigh that fact heavily here in considering whether Texas has standing in this immigration case."

The gist is yes, there are two skeptical judges and one Administration lackey on this panel.

50 posted on 04/19/2015 11:57:23 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson