[Old Teufel Hunden]

The problem is this is coming out too early in the campaign cycle. This stuff needs to come out next year. With it coming out now, there will be an “Obama” or two that will step forward to credibly challenge her and just like Obama, she is not going to make it through the Democratic primary season IMO. Will it be O’Malley? I don’t know but it will be someone. I think she’s toast, I just want her to be the nominee before she’s officially toast.

[lbryce]

I agree that timing is everything where it can either make you or break you,but the timing now in which Hillary has virtually eliminated herself, is of her own myopic doing. She wouldn't dare accept any responsibility for what was wrought in Libya, as she already performs under a terrible complex of weakness and which she believed would only appear to make her look weaker, less leader-like, to admit some responsibility.

To a weak, indecisive person to show any degree of culpability would in her mind only make her less electable because after all everything she said, did or decided upon had the singular point to have it look presidentially strong,and so what difference does it make in her mind removed any any weakness or blame towards her presidential aims.

[GOPJ]

Liberal elites have another ‘the ONE’ waiting in the wings - and they want the Clinton's off the stage as soon as possible. That's the timing here.

All the usual suspects one would expect to defend the Clintons are turning on them. At the same time - smells like it's orchestrated...

The Clintons have been corrupt since they waddle on the stage. You know that Hunden. The press has chosen to wear blinders. Why take them off now?

Groups like the New York Times haven't done any original ethical thinking in 50 years... they're not ‘starting’ now. The New York Times and Washington Post don't ‘get it’ they're just being played by a slightly different group. One more dangerous.