And while I am here, your world in 1965 was a lot closer to 1865 in the way you treated minorities and women.
We’ve come a long way. Be open to new things.
LOL, stop being an @ss. And by the way, "my world" was nowhere near 1965. But I will grant you that your snarling, impudent and arrogant tongue does fit this current world extremely well. As does your utter ignorance of recent history.
I'm glad your daughter can lift her end of stretcher. Its just pathetic that you think that that means any Special Forces operator would want her anywhere near them in combat, despite how liberated she is. Or that you think her abilities are relevant in this thread.
There's nothing like the arrogance of a perennially teenage man-boy. They always think their training-wheels are the real thing.
Women are still women regardless of year , read my post about how I was in charge of a unit with a trial of a woman assigned to us.
For the record I am not old and did not live in 1965 so lets cut the crap of you guys are old and you need to face the modern world.
Women doing athletes is no where near what they have to go through in a combat unit carrying 100 pound , under fire and then facing harsh conditions and then having to carry another guy on top of that weight.
is there men who would fail the test, yes there is , but it is not about men wanting change to have more men . This is about some women who want to get in there and have their standards lowered or social justice which is something you are advocating or it appears so.