I just do not know why.
But why does not Walker ask for the court to release the sealed records as the prosecutor proposes?
If the prosecutor was worried about the contents (or lack thereof) of the records, why would he challenge Walker to ask for the unsealing?
If Walker is certain this investigation is unwarranted, why would he not call for the unsealing of the records?
Something is not right here.
You are incorrect. This has been an alinsky witchhunt from day 1. the teachers unions are neck deep, including chisolms union teacher wife.
Duh...then Chisolm can go after him for interfering with the courts and abuse of office.....Chisolm has already leaked stuff to the press on his own.
The purpose of a John Doe investigation is to protect innocent people. Chisholm used that call for secrecy to keep people from getting lawyers, telling their friends and neighbors what was happening, expanding the 1st John Doe 18 times and then launching the 2nd John Doe - where 100+ subpoenas were approved during a marathon session by an activist judge.
Here are some sources where you can learn what this is about and what is going on, and what has been released:
Milwaukee County says nearly all Walker emails released
Open anyone of these articles on Wisconsin's Secret War and at the bottom of each one of the 194 investigative series entries, is an expandable list with titles, dates and links to all 194.
It will help you discover what "isn't right here."
Your assumptions are wrong to begin with. You’re assuming that everybody is playing fair.
Rule #1. When you make your opposition respond do your actions, then you are currently winning.
Chisholm’s solution is “Hey, just release the documents if you’re not guilty”. Those documents will contain nothing but allegations and innuendo, things that Chisholm himself put in the report.. Raw unfiltered hate from the left and the Union operatives. If it were otherwise, is there any doubt that it would have been already leaked and machinated over or even charges filed against Scott Walker?
Chisholm is the one on trial here, not Scott Walker.
Releasing material like this is mere fodder for the Media and increased visibility at National level political campaigns. It gives all of Scott’s detractors talking points, cover for tossing accusations about while not being sourced as the instigator.
Imagine a DA charging you with Child Abuse, complete with anonymous tips and information. The DA knows the charges are wrong and has no intention of prosecuting. He’ll just let the case languish in the local media until you are so defamed, you can’t recover your reputation and livelihood back.
Then, the DA dismisses the charges after noting there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.
Your concern underwhelms me...
if Chisholm thinks Walker lied...given what I stipulated above, the why didn't he just charge Walker with lying? We in Wisconsin all know John Chisholm hates Scott Walker....so if he wanted to get him, then why not charge him?
What is not right is the thought that unsealing the records, even if all is good, will settle the issue. The prosecutor/witch hunter will use every trick to twist things and extend this - right now it is a ploy to stop Walker's WH run and throw our side into deeper turmoil.
I think Walker is waiting for the issue to come to greater attention around the country, not just WI, so that the horror of the similarities to pre-war Germany can be exposed to more people.
If the prosecutor could charge Walker with something why doesn't he do so, rather imply he could but doesn't. Maybe you're not asking the correct questions?
The leftist lawyers and their armed Troopers collected things like member and contributor lists. If made public, even more innocent people would be exposed to harassment by lefty goon squads.
Collecting member lists of their opponents is a prime tactic of totalitarians. In the old days they would physically torture you to reveal your friends. Now they just break into you house and steal your computers.