Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Privilege
Townhall.com ^ | April 27, 2015 | Rich Galen

Posted on 04/27/2015 7:24:26 AM PDT by Kaslin

Last week General David Petraeus, as the result of a plea agreement, was sentenced to two years probation and a $100,000 fine for the crime of, as reported by CNN.com, "sharing classified information with his biographer and lover, Paula Broadwell." He was allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor rather than a felony.

The notebooks he shared with Broadwell "included notes from national security meetings, the identities of covert officers and more classified documents," according to CNN.

I have met David Petraeus although he would have to feign knowing me if we ran into one another. He rose to the rank of Four-Star General - the highest rank in the United States Military - on the basis of being smart, being good looking, being an excellent military strategist, and being no slouch at the kind of politics that is required in the rarified air of General Officers.

Federal law provides that there can be no more than seven Four-Star Generals in the U.S. Army at any one time, so the competition gets pretty fierce.

Two years probation for letting Broadwell have custody of highly classified materials is bad enough. Contained within the "Manual for Courts Martial" the crime of "adultery" carries a maximum punishment of:

"Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and confinement for one year."

A USA Today article states: "A four-star officer retiring with 40 years of experience would receive a pension of $237,144, according to the Pentagon."

That means Petraeus' fine on the breach of confidential materials amounts to about five months of retirement pay - pay provided by you and me.

And he was not charged with adultery at all.

If he were not Four Star General Petraeus but, instead, Staff Sergeant David Petraeus does anyone doubt he would be today a resident of the Disciplinary Barracks at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, serving who knows how many years, stripped of rank and retirement pay?

Let us now turn our attention to the other privileged group that made news last week.

The Clintons.

The New York Times - not the Vast Right Wing Conspiratorial Newsletter and Shopping Guide - made the connection between Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and Bill Clinton as the head of the Clinton Foundation and Vladimir Putin getting control of 20 percent of the uranium deposits in the United States.

In sum, while Clinton (Hillary) was Secretary of State, Clinton (Bill) appears to have been involved in helping Putin (Vladimir) gain control of a Canadian company that owns uranium assets in the United States.

The Clintons (Billary) and their defenders will maintain that there was nothing wrong and if there was something wrong it was done without either of their knowledge or approval.

Except that during this flurry of activity Clinton (Bill) was paid $500,000 for one speech under the sponsorship of a financial institution in Russia while people and organizations with a stake in the sale were donating millions of dollars to the Foundation (Clinton).

Over the weekend that same Times (New York) reported that the Clinton Foundation had announced it was looking at its tax returns for this period because, although it had reported donations from "foreign entities" in 2009 of "more than $122 million," it reported zero donations from foreign entities in 2010, 2011 or 2012 - all years when Clinton (Hillary) was Secretary of State.

In the words of former Texas Governor Rick Perry: Oops.

We don't know if there was there a quo following the quid between the Clintons (Bill and Hillary) and the Russian (Putin, Vladimir).

But, if this were about a foundation and a federal employee not named "Clinton" there would be a line of people under subpoena outside the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse just down the hill from the U.S. Capitol building waiting to testify before a grand jury.

We know that rank has its privileges, but in these two cases the privileges smell rank.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: judgesandcourts

1 posted on 04/27/2015 7:24:26 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would dearly love to be able to hear General Patton comment on this posting...alas.


2 posted on 04/27/2015 7:48:29 AM PDT by jennings2004 ("What difference, at this point, does it make!"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As for Petraeus, I suspect he would have skated completely except for the possibility he might run for office as a Republican. The Dems are good at sniffing out possible enemies for future elective positions. And the Clintons? I pray that this is their Waterloo.......FINALLY!


3 posted on 04/27/2015 7:49:15 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Not my circus, not my monkeys.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gen. Petraeus compromised classified information while on active duty. Why wasn’t he court-martialed?


4 posted on 04/27/2015 7:52:09 AM PDT by elcid1970 (cr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Petraeus, ... would have skated completely except for the possibility he might run for office as a Republican.

Petraeus was stalked by a stupid blabbermouth bimbo and was very guilty of poor judgement. However, the case would have never seen the light of day had he not foolishly telegraphed his political aspirations. He was not subtle enough when approached by the Republicans ... even mentioned in ...gasp ....print~!

Punishment may have been on the light side because the aforementioned bimbo and her sister serviced half the command staff and may (I say may) had some Middle Eastern family connection. In the sluts' defense, they may have thought they were just helping with morale.

5 posted on 04/27/2015 8:00:03 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Hi! We're having a constitutional crisis. Come on over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hey! Hey! Hey!

Petraeus was a good runner. That’s what counts.

The leaders of the Army are simple people. They have to have a simple way of evaluating people. Twice a year, Soldiers are evaluated by a stopwatch as they run a two mile course. A stopwatch is easy for the leaders of the Army to understand. Lower numbers = good. Higher numbers = bad. Promote the people with lower numbers. It’s easy.

Teamwork? They don’t understand that. How can they measure that? We have an Army that is led by good cross country runners who can’t win wars.


6 posted on 04/27/2015 8:01:21 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
We have an Army that is led by good cross country runners who can’t win wars.

Officer retention and promotion to Colonel and above is also determined by waist size.
Ideal: 32
And by height:
Ideal: 6' 1"

Political Correctness and Affirmative Action are also important. Stand by for 1st handsome, queer, black, athletic general.

7 posted on 04/27/2015 8:08:49 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Hi! We're having a constitutional crisis. Come on over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
Agree. This is all political. This Admin wouldn't have even given a passing thought to requiring a court martial........it's a Military thing and they detest the Military (until they can take credit for something good the Military has done....then it's back to detesting again). And, who was it that picked Paula Broadwell for the biography? That would answer a lot of questions.
8 posted on 04/27/2015 8:13:10 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Not my circus, not my monkeys.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I got my Petraeus bimbos mixed up. The biographer/stalker bimbo made the other bimbo(s) jealous. Things get confusing around Tampa and MacDill. Wonder what Mrs. General P is like.


9 posted on 04/27/2015 8:16:35 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Hi! We're having a constitutional crisis. Come on over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

FUDP & FUHC

10 posted on 04/27/2015 8:26:07 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
I have seen a picture of Mes Petraeus. She is a typical, middle aged mom type. Not flashy......I'm sure the Broadwell woman was just new and exciting. I wonder if this affair was intended when she was chosen to do the book. I wonder how Petraeus is doing now.....and if his wife is still with him.
11 posted on 04/27/2015 8:29:43 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Not my circus, not my monkeys.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What does the Specialist 6 patch have to do with General Petraeus?


12 posted on 04/27/2015 9:48:59 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson