Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: keat

Interesting hypothesis, can you elaborate?


9 posted on 04/27/2015 12:46:45 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: VinL

I think it was a set-up, poorly conceived and poorly executed, designed to make Cruz look like a misogynistic fool.

First, I don’t believe these two gentlemen had “no idea” about Cruz’s beliefs before hosting him.

Now they are able to run around saying “If I had had any idea what a monster he was I would never...”

Second, I’m sure they expected Cruz to say something they could use against him. He didn’t.

Lastly, the NYT gets to write snooty editorials, like this.

It’s all about making Cruz look out of touch with “mainstream” voters. They don’t care how it plays with his base. It’s a long game for them, wearing down his image with the general electorate.

Cruz played it right and came out looking good.


14 posted on 04/27/2015 1:12:13 PM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson