Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise

What are the chances that insurance companies will use that nit-wit mayor’s words and actions to curtail, delay, or deny any claims made by the damaged businesses? Or at least sue Baltimore for damages paid out for allowing the rioting to get out of hand?


20 posted on 04/27/2015 9:59:30 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS

Pretty soon a lot of businesses will be following the Colts.

25 posted on 04/27/2015 10:01:15 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

I think it is highly likely that the lawyers for the insurance companies are already preparing to deny claims based in part on the words of the Mayor.


44 posted on 04/27/2015 10:14:32 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

They won’t have to. Almost every insurance policy has an exclusion for damages due to riots etc.


66 posted on 04/27/2015 10:27:57 PM PDT by piytar (If you don't know what the doctrines of taqiyya and abrogation are, you are a fool!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS; Enterprise
What are the chances that insurance companies will use that nit-wit mayor’s words and actions to curtail, delay, or deny any claims made by the damaged businesses? Or at least sue Baltimore for damages paid out for allowing the rioting to get out of hand?

Thinking logically, insurance companies cannot deny the claims because the mayor's actions, and actions of rioters, were not caused or permitted by the insured people. The insured persons could not prevent this development no matter how hard they tried. The only way for an insurance company to not pay is if the contract disclaims their responsibility in case of a riot. And even then it remains to be seen.

However insurance companies, after paying the claims, *will* sue the mayor, the police, and everyone else who could possibly influence the outcome. It's what they are supposed to do - to be a buffer between the injured party and the guilty party. They aren't going to just absorb the losses, especially considering that it's a lot of money. Given the unwise statements of the mayor and the reluctant response of the police, they'll have an excellent case.

74 posted on 04/27/2015 10:41:52 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS
What are the chances that insurance companies will use that nit-wit mayor’s words and actions to curtail, delay, or deny any claims made by the damaged businesses?

And premiums will go through the roof.

78 posted on 04/27/2015 10:46:19 PM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

Not sure. I bet s hefty rate hike is aleready in the works.


90 posted on 04/27/2015 11:01:16 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

“It’s only property.”


197 posted on 04/29/2015 5:29:43 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson