To: The_Republic_Of_Maine
keep it in the cities, dont come out into the countryside, it is safer for you in the cities
Mathematically, this is an application of the inverse square law. They may be concentrated in the cities, but as they move out, they dilute their power by the inverse square of their distance from the city.
35 posted on
04/28/2015 6:16:34 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB
keep it in the cities, dont come out into the countryside, it is safer for you in the cities
Mathematically, this is an application of the inverse square law. They may be concentrated in the cities, but as they move out, they dilute their power by the inverse square of their distance from the city.You forget one very important fact, rural areas are well armed, there is little to no police and when the police do respond it is one or two cars after a 30 or more minute wait.
No, they will not spread beyond the suburbs of the cities, if that far.
Look, riots in Portland, Maine might spread as far as Windham, ME, but once outside of Windham, the price for trying to burn private property is to becomme part of the environment.
To: MrB; The_Republic_Of_Maine
Mathematically, this is an application of the inverse square law. They may be concentrated in the cities, but as they move out, they dilute their power by the inverse square of their distance from the city.Ah, yes, the environmental scientist's axiom:
The solution to pollution is dilution.
79 posted on
04/28/2015 6:56:11 AM PDT by
Rodamala
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson