Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

This Supreme Court hearing is a sham and any ruling in favor of mandatory acceptance of sodomy is arguably void on its face.

First: No federal court has jurisdiction to judge marriage as marriage is neither a right nor a privilege. For proof of this fact try to marry your adult sibling. As such its not covered under the 14th’s jurisdiction, nor is it a civil rights claim.

Second: Marriage is an establishment of religion. The First Amendment bars the government from changing it.

Third: Kagan and Ginsberg by publicly advocating for forced public acceptance of sodomy have demonstrated a bias as well as conflict of interest requiring them to recuse themselves from the case. They have not done so.

The absence of the forgoing arguments in front of the court and the refusal to recuse themselves by the two who have shown the most conflict of interest in the case are proof the hearing today is a sham.


16 posted on 04/28/2015 12:45:24 PM PDT by Mechanicos (Nothing's so small it can't be blown out of proportion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mechanicos

All good points and Ginsberg performing a homosexual sham marriage means she should have recused herself , but alas the arrogance of these liberal activist judges have no bounds.


18 posted on 04/28/2015 12:47:16 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson