The visible arguments presented at the relative eye-blink hearing are the tip of the iceberg, numerous scholarly briefs have been submitted, but pro and con. The pro-marriage arguments that I’ve read are rock solid, the marriage-redefinition arguments are all emotion at best, inane at worst.
Let’s hope they’re all read.
[[The pro-marriage arguments that I’ve read are rock solid, the marriage-redefinition arguments are all emotion at best, inane at worst.]]
From what I understand, the marriage-redefinition side is arguing “Gay people are a class of people deserving of respect and dignity, and marriage affords them dignity”
IF that truly is their argument, then any competent OBJECTIVE judge will declare that being gay does NOT make you a class of people- no more so than being a pedophile, necromancer, bestiality practitioner etc makes you a class of people- ALL are a DEVIATION of the natural course of things and have been declared by all societies practically to be immoral since life began- Being gay does NOT make a person a class of people deserving of dignity like being a minority does- being a minority is NOT a choice, being gay IS a choice- just like being a pedophile, bestiality practitioner etc are a choice period! Case dismissed!