Posted on 04/29/2015 10:07:19 AM PDT by markomalley
With six words—“It is going to be an issue”—the U.S. government signaled to orthodox Christian colleges and universities that if they don’t drop their opposition to same-sex marriage they will lose their tax exempt status.
Those words came yesterday when the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges, a case concerning whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s must guarantee the right for same-sex couples to marry. While the primary issue is whether gay marriage will be required in every state in the union, one exchange highlighted how the upcoming ruling could affect religious liberty. Justice Samuel Alito asked Solicitor General Donald Verrilli how it would affect educational institution that opposed same-sex marriage:
JUSTICE ALITO: Well, in the Bob Jones case, the Court held that a college was not entitled to tax exempt status if it opposed interracial marriage or interracial dating. So would the same apply to a university or a college if it opposed same-sex marriage?
GENERAL VERRILLI: You know, I…I don’t think I can answer that question without knowing more specifics, but it’s certainly going to be an issue. I…I don’t deny that. I don’t deny that, Justice Alito. It is … it is going to be an issue. In the case of Bob Jones University (Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)), the Supreme Court ruled that the religion clauses of the First Amendment did not prohibit the IRS from revoking the tax exempt status of a religious university whose practices are contrary to a compelling government public policy.
The policy at Bob Jones was indeed loathsome and contrary to Scripture, which the school later admitted when it apologized for it’s racist past. But opposition to same-sex marriage is not the same as racial animus. Yet the government, through it’s representative, has now signaled that Christians schools may soon be treated like racists and pariahs for refusing to give up the view of marriage shared by almost all people throughout history prior to the 1990s.
This threat is more radical than many people realize. It’s not merely that Christian schools will have to choose between accepting federal funds and keeping their religious views about sexuality. If the choice were to follow the example of schools like Hillsdale College or New Saint Andrews College and forego taking any federal money, the decisions about what to do would be painful, but obvious.
But what it being proposed is to revoke non-profit status, a move that would destroy many schools. According to the IRS, if an organization’s tax-exempt status is revoked it is no longer exempt from federal income tax and is not eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. As Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Seminary, notes, “The loss of tax-exempt status would put countless churches and religious institutions out of business, simply because the burden of property taxes and loss of charitable support would cripple their ability to sustain their mission.”
In 2005, Jonathan Turley, a law professor who support gay rights, warned this would happen:
The debate over same-sex marriage represents a coalescing of rights of free exercise, free speech, and expressive association. With the exception of abortion, same-sex marriage is almost unique in blurring neat divisions between these rights. Many organizations attract members with their commitment to certain fundamental matters of faith or morals, including a rejection of same-sex marriage or homosexuality. It is rather artificial to tell such groups that they can condemn homosexuality as long as they are willing to hire homosexuals as a part of that mission. It is equally disingenuous to suggest that denial of such things as tax exemption does not constitute a content-based punishment for religious views. . . . The denial of tax-exempt status presents a particularly serious threat to these organizations and puts them at a comparative advantage to groups with contrary views. When Turley originally made this claim ten years ago, many people assumed he was overstating the case and that same-sex marriage would not require people and organizations to give up their deeply held religious beliefs. But now, as we’ve seen time and time again over the past few years, the threat to religious freedom is all too real.
Are supporters of same-sex marriage—including the many misguided Christians—willing to let Christian high schools, colleges, and seminaries be put out of business simply for holding a Biblical view of marriage? Sadly, I suspect they will follow what Rod Dreher calls the “law of merited impossibility”: “It’s a complete absurdity to believe that Christians will suffer a single thing from the expansion of gay rights, and boy, do they deserve what they’re going to get.”
Not a lot of them are making any profit to tax
Would this not also apply to Jewish and Muslim schools as well?......................
The whole thing is to shut them down, and this is the bludgeon they are going to do it with...................
We have an amendment separating church and state...this sort of thing should be protected.
“Would this not also apply to Jewish and Muslim schools as well?”
Prosecutorial discretion
The Christian church started as an underground counter-culture and I suspect that it will return to that status before I die or shortly after. That does not bother me in the slightest.
God gave mankind the Law and Prophets to demonstrate how badly we needed a savior. After getting that ultimate grace, it took another 300 years for the “church” to become in institution and establish books full of rules on how to actually be saved.
God has no Plan B. We are living in Plan A. If that plan was to demonstrate how badly even the “church” could muck up the most beautiful love in existence, the love that sacrificed even for its enemies and deniers, that lesson will be happen.
Failing that the amendment that comes immediately after the first one also says we can protect religious liberties.
We both know how the story ends.................
my simple understanding, is that Churches I have gone to generally have income - expenses = 0. So, losing tax exemption status directly should not have an impact at the Federal IRS level? At the state level, there could still be state exemptions in conservative states, at least, I would hope, to work around things like property and other non-income taxes?
Donors would feel the change - but frankly, I would certainly not lower my giving in that situation, and would continue to strive to increase giving.
The Texas Legislature just approved vouchers for educating children. However, with this SSM law diminishing the protect of the Church, probably all parochial schools will just become a State-led institution. All being told what to say and do.
We should all be ashamed this country has drifted this far.
America is finished as long at the communists Democratic party exists.
Other than the fact that “It is going to be an issue” is seven words... I feel like a German living in 1932. Or a Russian in 1913.
Good once they are free of the trap of tax free status they can kiss the govt off.
Glad I’m not the only one who caught that. :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.