Posted on 04/29/2015 5:44:50 PM PDT by NetAddicted
Moshe Feiglin – who was a Likud MK in 2013-2015 – is out of the Knesset, for now at least, but his nonconformist thinking continues to arouse interest and spark fiery debate.
Feiglin took issue with the uniformly uncritical and adoring way Israel's media has been covering the plight of gay parents who were stranded with their newborn babies in harsh conditions, following the Nepal earthquake. These men hired poor Indian women to serve as surrogate mothers for their babies and then brought them to Nepal in order to give birth, because Indian law no longer allows gays to enter the country for the purpose of taking babies who were born through surrogacy.
About 20 such babies were born in Nepal in the days that immediately preceded the earthquake there. As a result, their gay parents reported situations of extreme distress. TV reports show the back seats of cars replacing the incubators in which some of the preemie babies had been held, and other difficulties faced by the parents.
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
These days, children are either ‘pets’ being groomed for a homosexual lifestyle, or they belong to The State to become good little Socialist Parrot Drones.
And in some extra special ‘families’ they are both!
What a world.
Be better if they just adopted cats from a shelter.
Can’t find the link but there was a gay couple who adopted two boys only to molest them and have them molested.
and then its gets sicker
Foreign babies are a Candy Shop to these pervs! If I had the means, I’d adopt them ALL to keep them from harm.
As it stands, all I can do is pray for a direct lightening strike.
Why?
...
"But perhaps there is a deeper conclusion. Maybe, only maybe... it is not just the physical need that only the mother can satisfy. Maybe there is a spiritual equivalent – a kind of spiritual milk, you could say – that only she can provide? And maybe, only maybe, tempting a Third World woman to give birth to a child she will never see – is terrible cruelty?
Okay, that creeps me out.
Surrogacy is perverted and cruel. It's misogyny: reproductive concubinage. It intentionally and forcefully stifles the maternal-child bonding which is a large part of human flourishing. It is contrary to children's natural needs and rights.
Tagline
OMG! Unbelievable. If you can find the other link, please post it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.