With the second person changing his story on this matter, I am not sure which version is correct, so I would file him under not credible at this point.
I don’t know what is going on with him or anything about him, so I don’t think it wise to really pay attention to anything he says.
That is my opinion only.
In terms of cause of death, I would look to go strictly with medical and forensic experts at this point.
Yep, and common sense, and our own personal experiences etc. One thing about it... both sides are going to have their own experts in court. I was a foreman on a murder trial, and we convicted him of murder 1 and gave him life without parole. Part of the jury instruction says a jurist should weigh all of the evidence and use their own experiences and common sense and judgement to decide who is telling the truth and who isn't.
There are allegations he was pressured to change his story. I don’t know if it is true or not, but wouldn’t surprise me a bit considering the political context.
This is another one where, his life was not worth the cost of the ammunition to end it.
The world is a better place without him, and his contribution to the gene pool has been deleted. Humanity as a whole has improved by his timely demise, that he had not sired others like him.