[USS Alaska]

Are you paid by the Walker campaign to repeat the same pro-Walker and anti-Cruz talking points over and over and over and over and over again. For several weeks you bring up almost identical articles and then post over and over and over and over again the same talking points. Guess they get their money’s worth but it is getting very boring, very predictable, and no longer meaningful.

Wifey and I have had our disagreements over the years, but she is not anti-Cruz just pro-Walker, as is her right.

I'm on Cruz control, but I'm not anti Walker.

Reno, if you don't like her posts, don't read them, is anyone forcing you to participate in this thread?

Mook.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Thank you.

You get it.

But I’ll spell it out for some others who want to continue “vetting” Scott Walker on the issues but quickly roll over and cover their eyes and ears when they find that their candidate holds or has held similar positions, or won’t clarify their positions.

That’s why I post back up links.

I do want Walker to be a top tier candidate and hash it out with the others. I never saw my advocacy as a big secret on FR, or to be considered a plot to undermine Sen. Cruz (who I supported in the TX Senate race - voted for - and posted articles in support of).

This dust up on this thread was started to deflect from what I posted in Post #1. Which, that last time I looked, no one has commented on.