[Servant of the Cross]

A little reminder of how the media [NYT] treated and defended free speech/'art' when it is blatantly anti-Christian ('piss' Christ) ....

“The photograph is clean and purified, the reliquary or shrine in which he clearly believes that the word about the body can be stored and spread,” Brenson wrote. “People may agree or disagree with him, or they may question his belief in photography, but how can anyone find in his work just obscenity and disrespect? It is hard to believe that anyone whose faith is searching and secure would not be grateful for what Mr. Serrano has done.”

How about we insert Pamela Geller's name where Serrano's is?

[Steve_Seattle]

Thank you for offering a specific example of the media reaction I was talking about in post #30.

[Steve_Seattle]

"The photograph is clean and purified, the reliquary or shrine in which he clearly believes that the word about the body can be stored and spread."

And the reviewer is talking about a crucifix in a jar of urine. You can't make this stuff up - how do you satirize it?