If its okay to have Piss Christ and the Virgin Mary covered in dung, regardless of how offensive adherents of the faith find them, then it is okay to show images of Mohammed, regardless of bow offensive adherents of that faith find such images.
I hope that some of the other “candidates” come out with similar statements. “Draw Mohammed cartoon contests” should be held in every gathering place in the country every day of the week. If Muslims don’t like it... they can go back where they came from.
No, it's okay to have Piss Christ and the Virgin Mary covered in dung because Christians won't kill you or blow up your television station if you defend the people who those objects out in public and get paid for doing so.
It's not OK to show images of Mohammed, because Muslims will kill you and blow up your television station.
And believe me, this line of reasoning makes total sense to the people in the MSM. They will never admit otherwise.
In concept I agree with you.
Has anyone at all pointed out where a cartoonist placed urine or dedication on Mohammed?
That art project involving Christ was way over the line as it relates to a revered religious icon, and any objections were laughed off completely.
Had it been just an art project like the Mohammad situation, I wouldn’t have approved, but it wouldn’t have been on the same grounds. I disapproved stridently based on vulgarity.
Where’s the vulgarity here?
With much less to go on, these folks side with the Islamists. Give me a freakin’ break.
Imagine a Conservative walking into that gallery and opening fire. Think anyone at all would have said the artist provoked someone, and he was to blame?
That’s what they are doing to Geller. Simply amazing.
Simple way to exposed the bigotry and intellectual bankruptcy of the Establishment Media talking heads like O’Reily et al.
What would their reaction been if two Christians had been killed attacking an Atheist group?
Hypocrites and Frauds AKA “Journalists”