Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Usagi_yo

If the D.C. Police are not going to make that video available than why have the officers where the cameras?

The reason to have the cameras is to show the public, the People paying the checks. what the Police are doing on a daily basis, for the good or the bad. Hopefully for the good.

Those cameras should be tamperproof and should be running at all times while the officer is on duty except for those times when he needs a personal break. When that occasion occurs the officers immediate supervisor can deactivate the camera and then reactivate it after the break has ended.


9 posted on 05/07/2015 4:28:53 PM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: puppypusher
If the D.C. Police are not going to make that video available than why have the officers where the cameras?

The video would not be subject to FOIA requests, but WOULD be available by court order (such as when the cop is a party to a criminal or civil case).

In cases where the video is "unavailable" due to "malfunction", the jury should be so informed, the opposing attorney should be able to cross-examine as to the reason for the "malfunction", and the jury should be allowed to form an opinion as to whether they think the lack of video was a deliberate attempt to suppress evidence.

15 posted on 05/08/2015 6:28:24 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson