Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
As I stated in my post, which you either didn’t read or couldn’t quite grasp, settled science isn’t always that settled.

I focussed on that one statement of yours - which really irritated me. That was poor form on my part. Sorry if I offended you.

So go ahead and get all pissy on me.

Yes, sometimes I do overly enjoy attacking a poorly-worded statement. It sounded a lot like that familiar refrain heard from Creationists to the effect of "Science has changed its standpoint so often in the past six hundred years [thank goodness for that!] that it has lost all credibility," and "It's all so complicated and confusing [read: to me, who flunked 8th-grade science] that it can't be true." (Disclaimer: I don't wish to imply that you, specifically, belong to that ilk.)

When you come to your senses, study up on issues of the day, and realize that there is generally descent within the scientific community, [...]

Yes, I'm well aware of the existence of dissent in the scientific community - but, in most cases, it seems to me like Creationists exaggerate its significance - like kids complaining that, because Mom and Pop sometimes aren't always in total agreement, they (the kids) know better.

The politicization of Science is a genuine issue (catchword: AGW).

In short: I'm sorry for the cheap shot and admit to sometimes being overly contentious.

Regards,

52 posted on 05/10/2015 2:02:15 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek

I am overly contentious as well.

As for my wording, it’s just fine by me even now.

As for if it’s up to your standards, I don’t, and I seriously question if anyone else does?

It wasn’t my wording and one of us is honestly enough to realize it. You’re just annoyed I won’t sign on to the God of Science program.

Not gonna happen chum.


54 posted on 05/10/2015 10:06:42 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: alexander_busek

I am overly contentious as well.
Well, the wording in that last post to you was not up to par. At least we can agree on that, so I’ve corrected it a bit.

- - -

As for my wording (in my first post to you), it’s just fine by me even now.

As for if it’s up to your standards, I don’t care, and I seriously question if anyone else does?

It wasn’t my wording and one of us is honest enough to admit it. You’re just annoyed I won’t sign on to the God of Science program.

Not gonna happen chum.


55 posted on 05/10/2015 10:10:16 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson