Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; Popman; cherry; All

According to the video at link there were no public funds spent on this and action of some kind may be taken against the district.

My thought is that instead of the district arbitrarily ruling the shed torn down at additional expense they could have worked out something to build a shed for the girls even though the girls didn’t give a hoot.


25 posted on 05/12/2015 5:46:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo
My thought is that instead of the district arbitrarily ruling the shed torn down at additional expense they could have worked out something to build a shed for the girls even though the girls didn’t give a hoot.

The rational world is only visible now from our rear view mirror.

26 posted on 05/12/2015 5:53:07 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The top half was for the girls but it wasnt good enough


28 posted on 05/12/2015 6:10:49 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
WHY even build a separate shed?

If there are THAT many girl varsity baseball players, they can store their bats and gloves in there, too.

Not like the shed says "No girl used equipment!"

FFS, does title IX "require" that there be a 100,000 spectator capacity girls football stadium be built in Ann Arbor?

Can't they SHARE?

35 posted on 05/12/2015 7:08:03 PM PDT by boop (Hey, stoop, that's got gears. It ain't no Ford.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson