To: SoConPubbie
Ted Cruz
Wait, we're throwing out his eligibility? Please... Ted stands zero chance. If you don't believe me, just ping me in October 2016.
7 posted on
05/15/2015 9:02:57 AM PDT by
TexasGunLover
("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
To: TexasGunLover
That kind of thinking got us 8 years of Obama.
16 posted on
05/15/2015 9:26:20 AM PDT by
al_c
(Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
To: TexasGunLover
Wait, we’re throwing out his eligibility
________________________________________
What are you talking about? Eligibility? Who says Ted is not eligible? He’s a NBC, and over 35.
22 posted on
05/15/2015 9:35:44 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
To: TexasGunLover
Which RINO are you for? Ted Cruz/Scott Walker 2016.
40 posted on
05/15/2015 12:36:44 PM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: TexasGunLover; AuH2ORepublican
Walker is my first choice. But Cruz is eligible, end of story.
If you wanna compare Cruz to Palin and say he’s not electable, ok that’s your opinion, I think he’s much stronger than Palin. But enough with this tiresome birther garbage, it just undermines your other arguments buying into that conspiracy BS. It was stupid when used against Obama (which is what these wild theories of what “natural born” means were invented for, they didn’t exist before 2008) and it’s really really f.ing stupid when used against Cruz (or Rubio or Jindal who are also eligible).
47 posted on
05/15/2015 9:36:00 PM PDT by
Impy
(They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson