Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
People say that it was because there had to be SOME REASON why all those people died. Slavery was the ex post facto reason seized upon to justify the carnage.

Should we not take the southern secessionists at their word when they said that they were acting to protect their slave interests?

144 posted on 05/19/2015 9:54:29 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels." --Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
“Should we not take the southern secessionists at their word . . .”

The reason Lincoln started the war is muddled. There is evidence Lincoln started the war to preserve the union. There is also evidence that he started the war to end the peculiar institution. Lincoln was like a politician so it's difficult to know how much of what he said to believe and how much to discount.

I don't think Robert E. Lee and like-minded southerners fought for the peculiar institution. Lee freed his s****s before the war.

148 posted on 05/19/2015 11:28:11 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Should we not take the southern secessionists at their word when they said that they were acting to protect their slave interests?

Acting in the belief that one is protecting one's self interests is a non remarkable position. What were the Northern interests? They were the ones who invaded.

149 posted on 05/19/2015 11:40:36 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson