Posted on 05/16/2015 7:58:45 PM PDT by upchuck
South Carolina PingKeep up with what our Congresscritters (House and Senate) are doing. Sign up for the free MegaVote email service here.
Ping PS - Did you know SC is on the list of 25 states suing nobama over his amensty order? Read more here.
Wonder if the Demwits would like to see Islamic laws in family courts?
Wouldn’t it be poetic justice for one of their daughters to marry one of the horde and then have sharia justice brought down on her.
They can all go pound sand!
Stoned to death for being lesbian. Stoned to death for being raped. Being seen in public without a hijab. Driving a car. Clitorectomy. Yes, that would be sweet.
Indeed. A classic example of “Be careful what you wish for. You may just get it.”
Traitors, all of them.
Let us recall that at Democrat Party convention in September of 2012 to nominate BHO to be their candidate for president that the convention booed a resolution to change the platform to omit the mention of God.
see for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUJE9YfsbNQ
So, what are we seeing when we see a party who ejects God, that is the God that most Americans think of, that is the God of the Bible, yet who defend the religious and secular law that is from the deity of a religion that is waging war against Christians and Jews?
I think we are seeing the mask slipping from secular progressive ideology. I think that this “secular” ideology is in fact a religion that is “hell bent” (so to speak) at waging war against people who follow God, that is people who are at least culturally Christian and Jewish. In the process, this ideology also wants to replace the free market and our republic with fascism.
And too many Republicans are being useful idiots about this treason.
Just to remind the Muslims and their progressive defenders why their efforts to destroy Israel will not succeed:
Psalms 132:13-14
(13) For the LORD hath chosen Zion; He hath desired it for His habitation:
(14) ‘This is My resting-place for ever; here will I dwell; for I have desired it.
Amen. Godless heathens trying to help other Godless heathens.
The problem with proposing a ban on Sharia is the consequence of the ban failing inevitably giving it tacit, legal support.
It’s better in my opinion to just enforce Constitutional law which Sharia cannot withstand.
Every day I am just so happy that some people here were screaming and putting up post after post after post after nauseating post that Romney was just as bad as Obama. Well, I guess that taught the GOP a lesson they will never forget.
See how fast they come running to Christians with guns.
Thanks for the Megavote thing. (I’m not in SC.)
Seems to me that you stated that wrong. Seems like they booed the inclusion of God.
What a mess we’ve made of this country.
In a nutshell, regarding sharia law Isaiah 5:20 says it best.
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.”
Did not the dirtbag demoncrat in drag, Arlen Specter, invoke Scottish law during the Clintoon impeachment proceedings? Demoncrats claim that making a law to prohibit the use of any foreign bullshiite laws from soiling our courts is a red herring. Dirtbag Arlen proved it can be done at the highest levels.
Across the United States, religious courts operate on a routine, everyday basis. The Roman Catholic Church alone has nearly 200 diocesan tribunals that handle a variety of cases, including an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 marriage annulments each year. In addition, many Orthodox Jews use rabbinical courts to obtain religious divorces, resolve business conflicts and settle other disputes with fellow Jews. Similarly, many Muslims appeal to Islamic clerics to resolve marital disputes and other disagreements with fellow Muslims.
Do we need to abolish all religious courts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.