Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edpc
Kasich has a fairly conservative background (not 100%, I know) and if he were elected I think we'd have maybe 70-80% common ground, and we could work to convince him on the rest. If Hillary gets in we can expect 100% opposition 100% of the time, offering no compromise, taking no prisoners, and destroying you at every opportunity. Some prefer that (i.e., the "at least we know who the enemy is" philosophy) but I don't see us gaining yardage playing that game.

And, no, I'm not talking about compromising principles. We hold to our principles and work to convince the officeholder who agrees with us on 3 out of 4 issues to change his/her mind on the remaining ones. It may or may not work, but at least we're in the game, which we otherwise would not be. On balance, that seems to be a more productive and positive approach than taking our ball and going home.

49 posted on 05/28/2015 11:58:22 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: chimera
if he were elected I think we'd have maybe 70-80% common ground

If he were elected he would find common ground with Schumer and Pelosi 80% of the time.

50 posted on 05/28/2015 12:07:41 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: chimera

My biggest problem with him is taking the federal money for state Medicaid. Congress is been reluctant to do anything serious about Obamacare. The actions and statements of Kasich seem to indicate that he tacitly approves it or would take actions to “fix” it. It needs to be gone, not sick, not defunded – repealed. It’s only one issue but it’s too big, too important, too invasive for compromise.


51 posted on 05/28/2015 12:23:27 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson