Chris Wallace interviews Marco Rubio

May 17, 2015 | Self

[privatedrive]

Yes Wallace was aweful.

But Rubio was really bad too.

He is clearly nowhere near ready for prime time.

[TomGuy]

Turned it on during that interview and watched him badger the witness and turned it off. We are so sick of journalists with agendas.

FoxNews has a history of hiring from the more liberal CNN, MSNBC, and other alphabets.

When the new hires come on, they try to show themselves are more mid-stream, but they don't always succeed. They know they can't just spout the same liberalism and Dem talkingpoints they had done at previous employments.

Wallace frequently slips back to the liberal side.

More recently, I have been watching Howard Kurtz on his Media program on FoxNews on Sunday morning. Kurtz tries to be a middle-of-the-roader, but he, too, slips back to the liberal side frequently.

They claim that their being 'journalists' give them license. It does, to a point, but spouting liberalism and Dem talkingpoints is not journalism, it is propaganda.

[bmwcyle]

Apple/Tree/Fall

[scooby321]

Chris Wallace rather you like or do not like his politics doesn't change the fact he is a horrible Sunday News Show.

He tries unsuccessfully tries to emulate his father

[moehoward]

You are of course right on all counts. With the possible exception of “amnesty”, depending on how tortured the definition is.

[terycarl]

ut HEY, we learned our lesson so we quickly put in Bohner, McConnel and the likes as soon as we saw the errors of our ways...< /sarcasm >

I see your point....Pelosi and Harry Reid were so much more your idea of perfection.....thanks.

[terycarl]

But Rubio was really bad too. He is clearly nowhere near ready for prime time.

Rubio didn't even stumble for a moment.....he's not my choice, Walker is, but I gained a LOT of respect for Rubio in that interview.....he never even hesitated!!!!