Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama bans some military-style equipment provided to police
AP ^ | May 18, 2015 7:28 AM (ET) | By NEDRA PICKLER

Posted on 05/18/2015 6:26:02 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nine months after police in riot gear dispelled racially charged protests, President Barack Obama is prohibiting the federal government from providing some military-style equipment to local departments and putting stricter controls on other weapons and gear distributed to law enforcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dictator; powergrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: DJ MacWoW

More tax dollars down the tubes.


41 posted on 05/18/2015 9:41:45 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Wow. I actually agree with Obama on something.


42 posted on 05/18/2015 10:05:51 AM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

What the hell?

First, it’s practically given away for free to local police in exchange for certain promises and controls by the federal government, and now he thinks that banning it is an acceptable alternative?

This gets more alarming by the day...


43 posted on 05/18/2015 10:22:12 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Where does the Constitution authorize fedgov to supply local police in the first place?

If you can't find where it does so, then how is ending or curtailing an unconstitutional fedgov action a power grab by fedgov?

44 posted on 05/18/2015 11:01:16 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Now that hes got a bunch of jacka$$es al wee-weed up, now he wants police to have nothing more than a handgun.


45 posted on 05/18/2015 11:05:17 AM PDT by Duckdog (If it wasn't for NASCAR my TV would have gone out the window years ago!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Where does the Constitution authorize fedgov to supply local police in the first place? If you can't find where it does so, then how is ending or curtailing an unconstitutional fedgov action a power grab by fedgov?

First show me where it says that it can prevent (ban) the local police from acquiring such equipment.
46 posted on 05/18/2015 11:08:18 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; Smokin' Joe

Yes, I’ve asserted/believed for quite some time that Obamajarett is gearing up for an invasion of the suburbs with their zombie orc armies from the urban core,

and that they will use law enforcement to protect their hordes from the homeowners.


47 posted on 05/18/2015 11:08:31 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Very subtle thing to notice here -
the police departments aren’t banned from HAVING them,
just from USING them.

Forward positioning for the federal police force.


48 posted on 05/18/2015 11:10:29 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MrB
...the police departments aren’t banned from HAVING them, just from USING them.

... Interesting. Not sure just what to make of it, but I don't like the federal gov't either providing the equipment nor preventing the use of it.

Local police/authorities should be beholden to the local citizenry, and the federal authorities should be beholden to the states and the citizenry.
49 posted on 05/18/2015 11:14:22 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
First show me where it says that it can prevent (ban) the local police from acquiring such equipment.

No where, but what does that have to do with this topic? AFAIK, they're not making such a ban (if they are, then that would be unconstitutional). They're banning fedgov from giving certain military equipment to locals.

What are your answers to my questions?

50 posted on 05/18/2015 11:16:45 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Where does the Constitution authorize fedgov to supply local police in the first place?

It does not. The Federal government has no business supplying local police with anything.

If you can't find where it does so, then how is ending or curtailing an unconstitutional fedgov action a power grab by fedgov?

I don't recall ever saying anything about a "power grab". Perhaps you have me confused with someone else.

The federal gov't has no constitutional authority to either provide nor limit local governments acquisition of any equipment. That's all I'm saying.
51 posted on 05/18/2015 11:30:20 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I’m not so sure they were “supplying” them to the local leos.
I think they just had a surplus and were selling them cheap,
but only to law enforcement.
Can’t have Billy Bob driving an MRAP around town, now can we?


52 posted on 05/18/2015 11:32:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Can’t have Billy Bob driving an MRAP around town, now can we?

Whether Billy Bob is driving one around or not is less of a concern to me than the idea that those who make and enforce the laws drive them around yet won't let folks like Billy Bob have one.
53 posted on 05/18/2015 11:37:38 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MrB

... and as far as I can tell, they were basically giving them away to LEOs.

http://www.dispositionservices.dla.mil/leso/pages/default.aspx


54 posted on 05/18/2015 11:42:57 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I was giving the “reasoning” of your average gov’t loving lib.


55 posted on 05/18/2015 11:43:44 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I understand, MrB. I already know that we think very much alike. Godspeed.


56 posted on 05/18/2015 11:58:54 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Barrack, the King of obfuscation, obstruction and the destruction of the Constitution wants police transparency?

spare me


57 posted on 05/18/2015 4:37:36 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Gotta give the planned riots some paid-for rioters and their ‘space to destroy’


58 posted on 05/18/2015 4:40:49 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“Agreed, police should be allowed no more or less equipment that citizenry.”

Obama has been a liar on every single issue. The only reason he could possibly be wanting the police to not have this equipment is that he’ll also hold that the reverse of your statement also holds true: that citizens cannot have certain items either. He may be starting with MRAPs, but I suspect this is just an excuse to twist it around and say you or I can no longer have any surplus military items either. This could eventually set precedent to saying nobody can own an old 03A3 or a Garand, and then lead to no AR’s. Of course his soon to be National Police Force will be exempt from all of it.


59 posted on 05/18/2015 4:55:09 PM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson