[gogeo]

D@mn straight...that should be obvious to all.

Unless, of course, one worships like a lefty...

[manc]

Onwe would have to be classed as one of the dumbest idiots or the most ignorant of the decade to not see how the homosexual agenda is threatening the freedom of religion which was the very basic founding of this country.

Many of us warned about this years ago only for liberals and libertarians to say their agenda was no big deal and it all started with their civil unions up in VT.

[grania]

I have no trouble with the concept of civil unions, because whatever ones sexual preference, they can be necessary to protect and direct assets and care. I have no trouble (well actually I don't "get it") with people's private sexual deviancies. I do have trouble with anything except one man-one woman couples being the ideal for raising children and having social stability.

I can live alongside same sex couples, but I don't want to know about whether their sexuality is deviant. Just keep it to themselves.

Civilization cannot exist in the cesspool we now have. There has to be a standard that's looked up to as the norm. I think a majority of US citizens support that view if it's expressed in such a way that ones privacy and rights are protected. It isn't difficult....gays have their rights, they have them without marriage being destroyed. They should just SHUT UP.

[GodAndCountryFirst]

If he SCOTUS “legalizes” gay marriage, then many states will feel honor-bound to leave the union and establish a new government that actually adheres to the U.S. Constitution. I would gladly move to one of those states if my state does not join them.