Posted on 05/18/2015 4:27:45 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Update: Nice catch by the GOP, noting that some of Hillary’s exchanges with Blumenthal come from the e-mail address “hrod17@clintonemail.com.” Two months ago, Hillary’s office issued a statement claiming that she only used one e-mail address during her time at State, the “hdr22″ address. Her lawyer, in response to a specific question about the “hrod17″ e-mail address, claimed flat out that that address didn’t exist until after she’d stepped down as secretary. Today’s e-mail revelation proves him wrong. Did Hillary lie to her staff and her attorney about that or did they lie for her? How many other “nonexistent” addresses did she use to try to keep her communications away from State Department and GOP investigations?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Hillary Clinton deliberately, and with planning, intended to violate the spirit and letter of the Federal Records Act. Any attempt to argue anything else is a deliberate obstruction of justice and/or the truth.
As I read in a thread somewhere else, she has been completely compromised as a presidential candidate. She used an unsecure server to conduct government business. We KNOW that server has been hacked. The question is, how many foreign governments have copies of the emails she sent?
The complete lack of common sense alone disqualifies her.
The intent to hide anything so that she would not be accountable disqualifies her.
In any rational world, she would have already been indicted for Obstruction of Justice and violation of the Federal Records Act.
+1
That's going to be our big problem leading up to 2016: invalidly assuming that Dems will care. They won't. They did not care about Bill Clinton lying. They did not care about his taking advantage of an intern. They did not care about allegations of forcible rape. THEY DON'T CARE. They only care about whether their agenda is forwarded.
Be interesting to find out what is produced by the Kremlin.
My spelling may be wrong but not as wrong as the Beast.
There is no getting through to the hard-wired. They only care, as you say, about their socialist agenda.
But there is the seed of the workaround in your own comment. These dedicated, left-over-from 1930’s leftists are indeed committed voters but there are fewer and fewer of them. More and more are those who, don’t get me wrong, out of ignorance or fecklessness, vote democrat. But more and more of them are or should be persuadable that the fiscal future of this country will either crush them, deny them the opportunity they seek or force them into tax slavery for much of their lives if indeed they are aspirational, career-wise.
I am not going to try to convince you of any sort of pollyanna optimism, I believe we are a hair’s breadth away from the tipping point in this grand battle. That being said, the effort of persuasion is very conceivably viable if directed at the young; this is what Mark Levin’s next book is supposedly about and I think he is on to something. Because as with every generation, there is going to come the point where these glossy-eyed utopian young’uns see that the tax burden and societal bruden imposed by feeding the endless illegals and the urban feral are going to land square on their shoulders.
This Hillary thing is IMHO VERY WIDELY illuminating to the ignoranti. It has not played out yet.
The question is does the She-Hag ever tell the truth?
A: no.
...and correspondence in relation to Bill and the Foundation....
I bet foreign governments were chortling about the various bribes offered by other foreign governments.
BTTT
If hackers have those Emails I wish they’d have the decency to release them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.