WAIT, wait .... I think the author of the article comes to an incorrect conclusion. From the original papers, it looks as though the WH administration knew (as far as this paper demonstrates) on the next day after the attack, Sept. 12, that the attack had been planned ten days ahead. This paper that’s published here does NOT show that the admin KNEW ten days ahead that it would happen. Those are two different things. The actual event (that our admin knew on the day after that the attack had been planned several days ahead, and then apparently willingly and knowingly promulgated the lie of it being a “spontaneous” protest) is bad enough. If we spread an incorrect conclusion, it makes us look like fools. Let’s stick to the facts, which are pretty awful in themselves.
Sorry, they had to plan and coordinate the protest in Egypt over the video and the attack in Benghazi in order to create the spontaneous lie they were telling.