Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley
Their letter contains no acknowledgment that there are societal costs to universal encryption.

Those "societal costs" are part of the risks associated with living in a free society, and I willingly accept them.

They are FAR superior to the alternative.

6 posted on 05/20/2015 4:37:56 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS

WayneS: “Those “societal costs” are part of the risks associated with living in a free society, and I willingly accept them.”

Me, too!

We can live in slightly more safety as slaves or take some small risks and be free. I choose the latter.

Not even the US Congress or the Supreme Court of the United States have the right to choose otherwise short of a constitutional amendment.


13 posted on 05/20/2015 4:52:25 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: WayneS

Yep, you can’t put a price on it. But the 4th Amendment is worth trillions...


16 posted on 05/20/2015 5:05:18 PM PDT by crusher2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson