I cannot disagree with you completely on this, but...they the college SHOULD do their PART to help this man, not strike a match near an open source of flammable material.
You are correct...it isn’t their RESPONSIBILITY.
But is IS the responsibility of the counseling staff to treat him appropriately, in my opinion.
I was being facetious when I said we should accuse them of “microagression”.
But I don’t see it as hypocritical in the least to ask that a non-muslim counselor be assigned to a man with PTSD, a well documented condition stemming from some of the most violent warfare in a muslim country, while at the same time ridiculing the efforts of minorities, feminists (specifically those minorities and feminists who DEMAND special treatment due to some kind of assumed societal traumatization or their perceived societal victimization) homosexuals and transgenders who are cravenly trying to leverage the mental health system to achieve their goals of societal acceptance.
If that subset of minorities and feminists, as well as homosexuals and transgenders accept they have a mental disorder (as this vet accepts his PTSD is a disorder) then I would revise my assessment.
Of course, I’ve gotten so cynical, my first question is always, “what am I not being told about the situation”. IF we are getting the whole story, it doesn’t sound like it is being handled well. Thus back to my first comment that he probably should be in a public university where he should have more rights.