If there's anyone out there that can offer reassurance that this ruling means anything meaningful at all I'd sure like to hear it.
Since the president is repeatedly overstepping his powers and not abiding by his oath to uphold the constitution (and has publicly jeered the Supreme Court at his SOTUS), perhaps he should be censured...
I take Napolitano’s comments with a grain of salt, I’ve noticed every time FOX reports a victory for the right against Obama and/or the left he finds a way to urinate on it. I don’t trust him at all.
More polite than Jackson's response.
While 0bama has a collection of about 14-15 of these smackdowns, he regards them as “guidance”, telling him exactly what he ought to do despite any pesky judicial order.
The “stay” is tantamount to keeping Pandora’s box closed. Opening it would be undo-able.
And Obamao knows this.
Open Borders Napolitano? He doesn’t “believe” in borders.
Likewise, Presidents openly issuing orders to ignore the law have historically been equally “rare”, though increasingly less so, it seems.
” “From the beginning, this lawsuit has been part of the ongoing anti-immigrant attacks against hardworking immigrants led by the extreme right.””
“From the beginning, this lawsuit has been part of the ongoing anti-illegal immigrant attacks against resource stealing illegal immigrants led by the patriots of the.”
Napolitano is correct about history, and in some ways I have to blame Congress, for allowing a situation to get to the point where the buck is passed to the courts because they refuse to use their powers and authority to rein in the presidents, including their power to impeach which is not subject to Supreme Court review.
Judicial slapped FDR pretty good about this far into his rein, to whit he tried to pack the Court and failed. The ONLY thing that saved his sorry socialist ass was Japan.