Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
 
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
 
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792
 
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
 
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
 

1 posted on 05/27/2015 8:22:18 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

2 posted on 05/27/2015 8:22:46 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie; 2ndDivisionVet

Ping!


3 posted on 05/27/2015 8:23:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Any “Free Trade” Agreement that has to be negotiated in more secrecy than most wartime peace treaties bodes poorly for “freedom”....


4 posted on 05/27/2015 8:24:05 AM PDT by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

bump


5 posted on 05/27/2015 8:28:13 AM PDT by gattaca (Republicans believe every day is July 4, democrats believe every day is April 15. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

/Declaration grievance

FUBO
FUCONgre$$

Isn’t the secrecy of “representative” government GRRRRRREAT?

/sarc


8 posted on 05/27/2015 8:34:41 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
The President has no numerated power of Executive agreements. Nor does Congress have the power to grant him such ability, unless the Constitution has been amended to give him such power.

The only numerated power a Pres has is with Treaties. Not even States can enter into any agreement with a foreign power without the consent of Congress.

9 posted on 05/27/2015 8:35:34 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie; All
"This later became known as the Congressional-Executive Act, which differentiated itself from a treaty which requires the 2/3 majority vote in the Senate. It is this Congressional-Executive Act that has been used for almost every American trade deal since the 1890’s."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Patriots need to understand that they need to check the constitutionality all official actions that that the federal government has ever done since the Constitution was ratified, the McKinley Tariff Act of 1890 which I think is the Congressional-Executive Act no exception . This is because there have been constitutional scandals since the George Washington was president. And activist justices were certainly alive and kicking when they gave Congress a green light for “creating new powers” for the president regarding tariffs in the late 1800s.

The bottom line is that any time that we hear about new powers in DC, if there’s no new constitutional amendment associated with those new powers then something is probably very wrong.

Again, “new powers” in DC have been happening since before the ink on the Constitution had dried.

27 posted on 05/27/2015 11:13:22 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

It’s amazing to me how quickly people will trust Obama and our secretive,backroom dealing government just to lick the boots of one man.

You know, Cruz is just a man. He’s not Jesus. And He’s the ONLY ONE I trust.


29 posted on 05/28/2015 10:14:56 AM PDT by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God! ROLL TIDE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson