1 posted on
05/29/2015 7:06:29 AM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Kaslin
When the government research grants stop rolling in.
2 posted on
05/29/2015 7:07:43 AM PDT by
lowbridge
To: Kaslin
When the funding dries up.
3 posted on
05/29/2015 7:08:08 AM PDT by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: Kaslin
it is their faith. It is the religion of the left...
they will never admit the truth....their faith is too strong.
4 posted on
05/29/2015 7:08:18 AM PDT by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Kaslin
We really need to stop calling them scientists. It’s an admission that they have credibility. There is nothing scientific in their research methods.
5 posted on
05/29/2015 7:08:37 AM PDT by
Daveinyork
( Marbury vs.Madison was the biggest power grab in American history.)
To: Kaslin
When they can get grants for doing so.
6 posted on
05/29/2015 7:08:38 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: Kaslin
When they stop getting taxpayer money for saying they’re right.
It’s as simple as that.
7 posted on
05/29/2015 7:08:39 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Kaslin
When they start getting government grants to prove that global warming is not happening.
9 posted on
05/29/2015 7:08:45 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: Kaslin
When there is an abrupt, catastrophic reduction in the temperature of Hell.
To: Kaslin
Liberals will never admit they are wrong about climate change for two reasons:
1: They never have to because it can't be disproven just like evolution.
2: Admitting they are wrong would show just how far they will go with a false idea to gain power and how deceived they can be by a false idea.
11 posted on
05/29/2015 7:11:03 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
To: Kaslin
They’ve been crying wolf about the climate changing since at least the 1920s. It isn’t going to stop anytime soon.
12 posted on
05/29/2015 7:11:26 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Kaslin
To: Kaslin
The reason the observations don’t match the predictions is . . . Global Warming!!!
15 posted on
05/29/2015 7:16:46 AM PDT by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Kaslin
never
never
never
never
never
never
never
never
16 posted on
05/29/2015 7:19:55 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Kaslin
19 posted on
05/29/2015 7:20:28 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
To: Kaslin
Who cares about some useless rhetorical admission of guilt? It gains nothing. Or worse, it just wastes time.
It may feel good, but 'feelings' are for liberals.
I ain't a liberal.
/johnny
To: Kaslin
What were Al Gore’s prediction from 20 years ago?
No polar bears.
Oceans 2 feet higher. Major cities under water
Hurricanes of devastation over and over...
22 posted on
05/29/2015 7:25:05 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Kaslin
So we are to believe a .2C temperature change in the last 36 yeas has caused famine, floods and droughts? And the more the temperature flat lines the more insistent they become. They use the term “Climate Deniers” but in reality they seem to be in state of denial.
24 posted on
05/29/2015 7:38:11 AM PDT by
Starstruck
(I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
To: Kaslin
Predicting the past was easy, the future not so much.
26 posted on
05/29/2015 7:46:51 AM PDT by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: Kaslin
If the “models” they use to do 100-year forecasts were actually any good, they could set them to the conditions of 1915 and run a 100-year forecast that matches the actual historical record for the last century.
If they could do that, they would have and they would be trumpeting it from the rooftops.
The fact that they haven’t means they can’t, and the models are garbage.
The technical term is “unvalidated”.
28 posted on
05/29/2015 8:06:49 AM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Kaslin
Uh, never?
29 posted on
05/29/2015 8:13:40 AM PDT by
PROCON
(CRUZing into 2016 with Ted.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
