Because paying blackmail is more criminal than being blackmailed.
He was a criminal for molestation, no doubt that was criminal, but odd that the payoff is the charge and not molestation or blackmail. Procedural crime.
The crime is that he used his own money. Ill-gotten perhaps, but his own money. Welcome to the new America.
Come on fool, he voted for the law that made structuring illegal. He structured and then lied about structuring to the FBI to cover up his alleged molestation of an underage male and his alleged homosexual affair.
Money laundering is at the heart of the patriot act.
“He was a criminal for molestation, no doubt that was criminal, but odd that the payoff is the charge and not molestation or blackmail. Procedural crime.”
It occurs to me that you are right. I have been scratching my head for 24 hours on what is really going on. I speculate this is not the reason for $3.2 million pay off. That “Kid” would be 50 years old. Hastert was finished long ago as a politician. Where is the extortion charge? Why is this side of a criminal act being covered up? I think this has nothing to do with a pedophile and more to do with something else. Where are Woodward and Berstien? Wasn’t the money Hasterts to begin with? get your pop cord ready on this one. ( also note it broke on friday?? )
“He was a criminal for molestation, no doubt that was criminal, but odd that the payoff is the charge and not molestation or blackmail. Procedural crime.”
Not really, they want to be sure that blackmailers pay taxes too. I believe government considers tax evasion to be one of the most dastardly of deeds.