However as loyal Democratists, they will still vote for her 110%.
the party won let her destroy the brand.
theyhave TOO much at stake..to allow the deomcrack party to forever be branded the Clinton Party
Yup. Evita Peron was all of those things, but so long as she continued to hand out goodies she was beloved.
When does this become a “vote of no-confidence”?
Tolerance is all well and good, but eventually, a sense of self-preservation has to kick in. The Clintons have been breathing up all the oxygen in the room for way too long.
Like the coal miners in West Virginia supported Barkey.
Right. Once they hear what the Democratic Media has to say about her opponent, they’ll run to her like a chicks to a hen.
We need 57% of the voters to not vote for her. Then we’re making progress.
Or get a Wealthy Watermelon to run as a 3rd party candidate.
yeah it drives me crazy. she’s everything bad but she’s a woman, for gay marriage, and says she believes in global warming
Oh, yeah. The Democrats could nominate Satan himself and they’d still turn out to vote and otherwise do exactly as their media cheerleaders tell them to do.