Don’t think anyone should trust the Clintons - they’re capable of anything. But I don’t believe the New York Times would assist with money laundering. Not their style.
That said, you’ve got the Clintons pegged Liz...
Well, of course-—I did not intend to imply the NYT was aiding and abetting the Clintons’ money-laundering.
However, on second thought-——consider the “tolerant and compassionate” liberal mindset-—and the cunning money-hungry Clintons.
The NYT foundation might easily have been inveigled into parting w/ tax-free monies to “help the needy”...that never got to the intended cause.