Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paristexas
You are acting like a troll. I mentioned crime, you posted hate crime stats. Here is proof:

"But in fact, white-on-black crime is a statistical rarity. According to data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), an estimated 320,082 whites were victims of black violence in 2010, while 62,593 blacks were victims of white violence."

"Whites therefore committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 32 per 100,000, while the black rate was 849 per 100,000. In other words, the “average” black was statistically 26.5 times more likely to commit criminal violence against a white, than vice versa. "

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1628

I rest my case.

360 posted on 06/18/2015 6:12:58 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: PghBaldy

Well done!


367 posted on 06/18/2015 6:23:38 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

Why do you say I was acting like a troll by asking you where your evidence came from? I was curious. Is that a crime? As to the NCVS data, sounds like credible evidence, thanks, though it is based on surveys by the US Census bureau, using a similar methodology that they use to produce the monthly unemployment rates, so I can’t say that NCVS is an unimpeachable source.

I still don’t understand why you say that it is very rare for blacks to be victims of white violence when your own statistics say that it happens more than 60,000 times a year.


398 posted on 06/18/2015 7:04:51 AM PDT by paristexas (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson