I will place more stock in the constitutional legal opinion of a man who has argued a number of cases before the USSC, and won most of those, than the opinion of an unknown person posting on the Internet.
How many arguments before the USSC have you made?
I decline to reason backwards from admiration of an individual candidate. I prefer to form my political judgments about candidates by reasoning from their position on issues toward the individual. Do you realize that your method of argumentation consists of veering between adulation of the individual and ad hominem against those with whom you disagree? Your argument consists of resort to authority while accusing the other side of failing to produce evidence, evidence which you adamantly ignore.
