[semimojo]

Even those who think the motion has no merit should be screaming bloody murder over the lawless way the case is being handled because it proves the lawlessness of those who are handling the case, and that undermines EVERYTHING that SCOTUS is supposed to be about. It also undermines everything that the whole lawyering profession is supposed to be about and reduces the whole system to a farce

Even the WND article doesn't accuse anyone of breaking the law. What statutes do you think are being violated here?

[txhurl]

It depends on what you think the headlines are gonna be.

SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF SAME-SEX; DOZENS OF FILED RECUSAL MOTIONS NOT RECORDED ON DOCKET IN RUN-UP TO DECISION

or

SCOTUS DELIVERS DEFEAT TO SAME-SEX MARRAIGE PLAINTIFF 4-3
AFTER 2 JUSTICES RECUSE FROM CASE AMID PROCEDURAL MISTAKES

[butterdezillion]

Do you think it’s lawful for submitted motions to be left unfiled, deleted, and altered?

[xzins]

Yes it does: Finally, a federal statute, 28 U.S.C. sec. 455(a), further mandates that a federal judge ‘disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned,’” Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/supreme-court-caught-messing-with-marriage-case/#8pk4E1QCh60Wmym3.99