Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sakic
You must be upset by the lack of Quakers on the Supreme Court

It would help! But I prefer Anabaptists, for their Protestant fundamentalism.

Good luck marching backwards in time

Oh, Got It, you're a Progressive! Who knew.

Isn't it interesting how "progress" is defined as replacing egalitarian Anglo Protestant norms with regressive feudalist notions like Socialism, usually with the people who bear those ideas?

You'll forgive me if I regard that as ordinary Soviet propaganda tactics - inverting the meaning of a word and labeling it the latest thing.

27 posted on 06/24/2015 1:21:27 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator

The notion that the Court shouldn’t include Catholics or Jews is a repugnant motion to me. We disagree.


28 posted on 06/26/2015 12:58:37 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson