Posted on 06/23/2015 6:45:47 AM PDT by don-o
Thank you for your posts that make it no longer a mere assumption on my part that you deceive yourself and others, but a plain observation based on your acts here.
I invite you and everyone else here to go back and re-read my posts. I have not taken a side on this because I wasn't there and want to wait for the attorneys from BOTH sides to present their case in a court of law, not the media.
I'm sorry that you haven't recruited me to your way of thinking. Neither has Texas Gator or anyone else.
“I’m sorry that you haven’t recruited me to your way of thinking.”
There goal is not to recruit me or you.
There goal is to eliminate.
... TWO more have since joined to voice their agreement with that minority, while only one has joined to voice agreement with the majority both on this thread in FReeper sentiment on this issue since the start. This is a numbers game -- by posting prodigiously, a minority manages to make itself look not nearly as small as it actually is, but they have to work at it.
I have followed many trials...It takes an endless amount of time to know all the evidence..If you're lucky there's a preliminary hearing and it is televised. Even then all the evidence need not be presented...just enough to get to trial.
Patience is required.
I hope you're not talking about me. I have no agreement or disagreement with either side here.
Please go back and re-read my posts. They are right there in full view of God and everybody.
Thanks.
I have been doing my due diligence on Google. Didn’t know much about MC. I know a bit more now.
Don’t give up. Your perspective is appreciated. Servus!
“Have No Mercy” is one.
“You are assuming again.”
No it goes further, she is accusing you. And what BTW gives her that right? one might ask?
Not in my case, it comes from the contemporary Austrian usage.
LURKERS, take note. Same old same old -- now the numbers of folks who push the MSM/police narrative are nearly half the numbers of people on this thread who like all smart conservatives DOUBT the MSM and consider the MSM a flawed, deeply biased source of info.
But these MSM-narrative advocators post prodigiously to create the impression that they aren't outnumbered two to one. LURKERS, understand this. Folks like AMDG&BVMH represent what most FReepers reject, so this minority strives to present an illusion of numbers via frequency of posts.
“Folks like AMDG&BVMH represent what most FReepers reject”
My credentials in the support of our Constitution are above reproach. Too bad you can’t discuss issues without attempted character assassination. My character is above assassination. Despite what an amazingly limited view you have of my entire life and endeavors, you feel free to attack my person and my character. That is the tactic of the Left, and it will not stand. I will certainly not be intimidated by it.
Stop tallying people into categories of your making, and start listening to what people are actually saying.
Count the number of YOUR posts on this thread, Finny.
The sign off to a communication is to the person or persons addressed; my case, fellow FReepers.
Given a civilized view point, one might humbly submit one’s facts, information, and commentary to the addressee(s) for their honest consideration. Which is the intent for which I addressed them, in response to their previous commentary.
Stating to the addressee that a submission is made in Servus, indicates that is is made in good will with all honest humility, to them, to further the conversation toward TRUTH.
As my father wrote on the barn walls with carpenter chalk in German, “I SERVE” in all humility, and with all integrity for the honest and hard work he did for the greater good; I sometimes sign off SERVUS, meaning I humbly serve my readers, with whatever facts, information, and commentary I can provide; and that such submission is made in all good will. How that can be construed to be a negative, I for one certainly can’t imagine. There are many posters here who treat fellow FReepers with far less regard.
I SERVE. [is that better?]
” LURKERS, understand this. Folks like AMDG&BVMH represent what most FReepers reject”
And, Mr. Alinsky, what gives you the right to speak for most FReepers?
“Secondarily, how many of these weapons were actually used?”
At least 32 shots by the bikers.
>>> At least 32 shots by the bikers. <<<
Another irrelevant response.
Stubbs, “Bow Tie” is the “big gun” Bandido attorney from Las Vegas.
It is hard to know where to begin, this post has attracted so many points of view.
Back to the picture of the alleged under cover cop.
WHY does he not have any blood on him? That is the question of the moment.
Despite all my attempts to trace down the “rumor” of a snitch or undercover in the Cossacks, the only “source” is Bow Tie himself and his Bandido interviewees, or other Bandido social messaging.
The two persons thereby alleged or “rumored” to be snitch or under cover within the Cossacks, do not match the picture of the supposed undercover cop we have seen on these threads.
Both of them would have blood on them. VooDoo as previously noted, performed first aid at the scene. The other Bandido rumored snitch or u/c, was Big O himself, who would also have had blood on him, as he and his step-son were throwing punches with the Bandidos in the parking lot before Richie (his step-son, who evaded a punch) was shot point blank in the chest. Anyone doubt that Big O would have blood on him?
The alleged u/c had no blood on him.
So just maybe we should go back to the source of the “rumors” of a snitch / u/c in the Cossacks. How could the Bandidos know that? since as far as I have been able to determine, they are the only source of this “rumor”.
Said rumor which could cause the deaths of VooDoo or Big O! They are both still in jail. Still alive for now.
Why would their deaths, or inability to testify, matter to the Bandidos, or their “Big Gun” attorney from Las Vegas??
MAYBE because Big O was the one contacted by Bandido “Marshall” to set up the parley at 11am. Such parley, which resulted in the deaths of 9 and wounding of 18, could implicate ALL Bandidos present under RICO provisions.
So the Bandido side is that — Voodoo and / or Big O were LE snitches?? Both of them would have been covered in blood, both of them are still in jail.
And why should Bandido social media pursue Yvonne, whose son “Chain” was the first to fall? She originally said, the police saved lives, despite the death of her own son. Maybe she was thinking of her husband. Her earlier posts have been deleted.
Yes this all stinks to very high heaven and it stinks of Mafia tactics. Should Big O not testify against the Bandidos, look to Bandido pressure on his wife, or their obituaries. JUST SAYING!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.