The co-founder of the Clinton Foundation's Canadian affiliate is revealing new details about the charity's donors in an effort to counter allegations in the New York Times and in Clinton Cash. ..... prompting new scrutiny of the Clintons financial and charitable affairssomething thats already proved problematic given how closely these two worlds overlap.
Last week, the New York Times examined Bill Clintons relationship with a Canadian mining financier, Frank Giustra, who has donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and sits on its board. Clinton, the story suggests, helped Giustras company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received a flow of cash to the Clinton Foundation, including previously undisclosed donations from the companys chairman totaling $2.35 million.
Giustra strenuously objects to how he was portrayed. Its frustrating, he says. And because the donations came in through the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (CGEP)a Canadian affiliate of the Clinton Foundation he established with the former presidenthe feels doubly implicated by the insinuation of a dark alliance.
Were not trying to hide anything, Giustra says. There are in fact 1,100 undisclosed donors to the Clinton Foundation, Giustra says, most of them non-U.S. residents who donated to CGEP. All of the money that was raised by CGEP flowed through to the Clinton Foundationevery pennyand went to the [charitable] initiatives we identified, he says.
The reason this is a politically explosive revelation is because the Clinton Foundation promised to disclose its donors as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming secretary of state. Shortly after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, the Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year.
The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.
It hasnt. Giustra says thats because Canadas federal privacy law forbids CGEP, a Canadian-registered charity, from revealing its donors. A memo he provided explaining the legal rationale cites CGEPs fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canadas Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors, he says.
On Saturday, responding to the Times story, Maura Pally, the acting CEO of the Clinton Foundation, issued a statement echoing this assertion: This is hardly an effort on our part to avoid transparencyunlike in the U.S., under Canadian law, all charities are prohibited from disclosing individual donors without prior permission from each donor.
Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of this claim. Len Farber, former director of tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasn't aware of any tax laws that would prevent the charity from releasing its donors' names.
"There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing the names of donors," he said. "It's entirely up to them." Mark Blumberg, a charity lawyer at Blumberg Segal in Toronto, added that the legislation "does not generally apply to a registered charity unless a charity is conducting commercial activities... such as selling the list to third parties."--SNIP--
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-04-29/clinton-foundation-failed-to-disclose-1-100-foreign-donations